Rethinking Beet Pulp

For decades, beet pulp has been a staple in many feed rooms, praised as an affordable source of digestible fiber for horses. However, as our understanding of functional nutrition evolves and new research emerges, it's time to take a closer look at this common feed ingredient. What's being discovered may prompt you to reconsider whether beet pulp deserves its place in your horse's diet.

The Hidden Costs of an "Affordable" Feed

While beet pulp may seem economical at first glance, the potential long-term health implications suggest we need to expand our definition of "cost" beyond the price per bag. Through the lens of functional nutrition—which considers not just nutrient content but bioavailability, toxin exposure, and systemic effects—beet pulp reveals itself as a potentially problematic feed choice.

1. The Calcium-Phosphorus Imbalance

One of the most significant nutritional issues with beet pulp is its dramatically skewed mineral profile. With a calcium to phosphorus ratio of approximately 10:1, beet pulp far exceeds the recommended ratios for equine health:

• Growing horses: Need a Ca:P ratio between 1.2:1 and 2:1

• Mature horses: Can tolerate ratios up to 6-7:1, with 2:1 being ideal

This extreme imbalance can lead to several serious health conditions:

Nutritional Secondary Hyperparathyroidism (NSH), also known as "Big Head Disease," occurs when mineral imbalances trigger the parathyroid glands to pull calcium from bones. The extreme calcium excess in beet pulp can interfere with phosphorus absorption, creating a functional deficiency despite adequate dietary phosphorus.

Developmental Orthopedic Disease in young horses results from mineral imbalances during critical growth phases. Proper bone formation requires precise Ca:P ratios, and significant deviations lead to lasting skeletal abnormalities.

From a functional medicine perspective, excess calcium interferes with zinc absorption (affecting immune function), magnesium uptake (critical for nerve and muscle function), and iron utilization (necessary for oxygen transport). This creates a cascade where one imbalance triggers multiple deficiencies.

2. Aluminum: The Hidden Contaminant

The use of aluminum sulfate as a pressing agent during beet pulp processing represents perhaps the most concerning aspect. This chemical rigidifies the beet pulp cell walls to increase pressing yield during water removal. Testing by toxicologist Dr. Susan Cook has revealed aluminum levels of 250+ ppm in processed beet pulp, consistent with other laboratory findings showing levels ranging from 336 to 600+ ppm in beet pulp-based feeds.

Aluminum is a recognized neurotoxin with no biological function in mammals.

Extensive human research documents its harmful effects:

• Crosses the blood-brain barrier and accumulates in neural tissue

• Disrupts mitochondrial function and cellular energy production

• Triggers oxidative stress and inflammatory cascades

• Interferes with hundreds of biological processes

• Bioaccumulates with a half-life measured in years

In horses, aluminum exposure may:

• Interfere with dopamine production, affecting movement and behavior

• Disrupt manganese and chromium absorption

• Accumulate in brain, bone, liver, and kidney tissues

• Contribute to metabolic dysfunction

Research in ponies has demonstrated that high dietary aluminum suppresses phosphorus absorption, creates negative calcium balance through increased urinary excretion, and interferes with the metabolism of essential minerals including zinc, iron, copper, and magnesium.

The aluminum-iron interaction may explain why some horses on beet pulp develop anhidrosis (inability to sweat), as iron is essential for sweat production. Aluminum also competes with magnesium for cellular uptake, potentially contributing to muscle tension and anxiety issues common in sport horses.

3. Chemical Residues: A Modern Reality

Today's sugar beet production relies heavily on chemical inputs:

Glyphosate-Resistant GMO Varieties dominate production. By 2009/2010, approximately 95% of sugar beets grown in the United States were genetically modified to resist glyphosate herbicide, allowing multiple herbicide applications throughout the growing season without damaging the crop.

Pre-Harvest Defoliants kill the leafy tops before mechanical harvesting, adding another layer of chemical exposure.

Cumulative Toxic Load occurs when horses consume multiple chemical residues daily for years. The body's detoxification pathways can become overwhelmed by this chronic exposure.

Glyphosate specifically:

• Disrupts gut microbiome by selectively killing beneficial bacteria

• Chelates essential minerals, reducing their bioavailability

• Interferes with detoxification enzymes

• Contributes to intestinal permeability

The Functional Nutrition Alternative

Rather than attempting to correct beet pulp's deficiencies through supplementation, functional nutrition advocates for whole food sources that naturally provide balanced nutrition:

Fiber Alternatives

• Timothy hay or cubes

• Soaked mixed grass hay pellets for horses needing softer feed

• Ground flax or chia seeds for omega-3 fatty acids

• Psyllium husk for specific digestive support

Clean Processing

Seek feeds processed without chemical additives. While initially more expensive, the potential savings in veterinary bills and improved long-term health often justify the investment.

Making the Transition

If eliminating beet pulp from your feeding program, make changes gradually over 6-7 weeks:

1. Weeks 1-2: Replace 25% of beet pulp

2. Weeks 3-4: Replace 50%

3. Weeks 5-6: Replace 75%

4. Week 7: Complete transition

Monitor body condition, manure consistency, and overall health throughout. Some horses may need additional calories from healthy fat sources to maintain weight.

The Bottom Line

While beet pulp has been fed for decades, mounting evidence suggests it may contribute to mineral imbalances, toxic accumulation, and metabolic dysfunction in horses. The combination of imbalanced mineral ratios, aluminum contamination, and chemical residues presents a compelling case for reconsidering its use.

Consider this: If you wouldn't feed a supplement with such skewed mineral ratios, why choose beet pulp? If you're concerned about chemical exposure, why select a heavily processed ingredient? If supporting metabolic health is your goal, why add aluminum that interferes with essential minerals and neurotransmitter function?

Your horse's health is worth more than convenience. Whenever possible, choose species appropriate, nutrient dense, real foods that support, rather than challenge, their physiological systems.

References

Ackermann, W., Coenen, M., Schrödl, W., Shehata, A. A., & Krüger, M. (2015). The influence of glyphosate on the microbiota and production of botulinum neurotoxin during ruminal fermentation. Current Microbiology, 70(3), 374-382. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-014-0732-3

Allen, V. G. (1984). Influence of dietary aluminum on nutrient utilization in ruminants. Journal of Animal Science, 59(3), 836-844. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1984.593836x

Barnett, J. A., & Gibson, D. L. (2020). H2: Broad-spectrum herbicide impacts on the host-microbiome. In D. L. Gibson & M. C. Arrieta (Eds.), Gut microbiome and its interaction with the immune system (pp. 33-57). Springer.

Chen, H., Yang, B., Ke, T., Li, S., Yang, X., & Chen, P. (2021). Mechanisms of metal-induced mitochondrial dysfunction in neurological disorders. Toxics, 9(6), 142. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics9060142

Exley, C. (2017). Aluminum should now be considered a primary etiological factor in Alzheimer's disease. Journal of Alzheimer's Disease Reports, 1(1), 23-25. https://doi.org/10.3233/ADR-170010

Fulgenzi, A., Vietti, D., & Ferrero, M. E. (2014). Aluminium involvement in neurotoxicity. BioMed Research International, 2014, 758323. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/758323

Grasman, B. T., & Hellgren, E. C. (1993). Phosphorus nutrition in white-tailed deer: Nutrient balance, physiological responses, and antler growth. Ecology, 74(8), 2279-2296. https://doi.org/10.2307/1939582

Hintz, H. F., & Schryver, H. F. (1976). Potassium metabolism in ponies. Journal of Animal Science, 42(3), 637-643. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1976.423637x

Janicki, K. M., & Vineyard, K. (2024, April 29). Beet pulp FAQs. The Horse. https://thehorse.com/148325/beet-pulp-faqs/

Kumar, V., & Gill, K. D. (2014). Oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunction in aluminium neurotoxicity and its amelioration: A review. NeuroToxicology, 41, 154-166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuro.2014.02.004

Leino, L., Tall, T., Helander, M., Saloniemi, I., Saikkonen, K., Ruuskanen, S., & Puigbò, P. (2021). Classification of the glyphosate target enzyme (5-enolpyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate synthase) for assessing sensitivity of organisms to the herbicide. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 408, 124556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.124556

Legrand, I. (2015). Sugar beet pulp in animal nutrition. Confédération Générale des Planteurs de Betteraves.

Martinson, K. (2022, July 29). Understanding Ca and P ratios for horse health. The Horse. https://thehorse.com/198894/understanding-ca-and-p-ratios-for-horse-health/

Mesnage, R., Teixeira, M., Mandrioli, D., Falcioni, L., Ducarmon, Q. R., Zwittink, R. D., Mazzacuva, F., Caldwell, A., Halket, J., Amiel, C., Panoff, J. M., Belpoggi, F., & Antoniou, M. N. (2021). Use of shotgun metagenomics and metabolomics to evaluate the impact of glyphosate or Roundup MON 52276 on the gut microbiota and serum metabolome of Sprague-Dawley rats. Environmental Health Perspectives, 129(1), 17005. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP6990

Motta, E. V. S., Raymann, K., & Moran, N. A. (2018). Glyphosate perturbs the gut microbiota of honey bees. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(41), 10305-10310. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1803880115

Myers, J. P., Antoniou, M. N., Blumberg, B., Carroll, L., Colborn, T., Everett, L. G., Hansen, M., Landrigan, P. J., Lanphear, B. P., Mesnage, R., Vandenberg, L. N., vom Saal, F. S., Welshons, W. V., & Benbrook, C. M. (2016). Concerns over use of glyphosate-based herbicides and risks associated with exposures: A consensus statement. Environmental Health, 15, 19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12940-016-0117-0

National Research Council. (2007). Nutrient requirements of horses (6th rev. ed.). National Academies Press.

Oklahoma State University Extension. (2024, April 1). Minerals for horses: Calcium and phosphorus. https://extension.okstate.edu/fact-sheets/minerals-for-horses-calcium-and-phosphorus.html

Prakash, A., Shur, B., & Kumar, A. (2013). Naringin protects memory impairment and mitochondrial oxidative damage against aluminum-induced neurotoxicity in rats. International Journal of Neuroscience, 123(9), 636-645. https://doi.org/10.3109/00207454.2013.785476

Samsel, A., & Seneff, S. (2013). Glyphosate's suppression of cytochrome P450 enzymes and amino acid biosynthesis by the gut microbiome: Pathways to modern diseases. Entropy, 15(4), 1416-1463. https://doi.org/10.3390/e15041416

Schryver, H. F., Hintz, H. F., & Lowe, J. E. (1986). Metabolism of some essential minerals in ponies fed high levels of aluminum. Cornell Veterinarian, 76(4), 354-360.

Sharma, D. R., Wani, W. Y., Sunkaria, A., Kandimalla, R. J., Verma, D., Cameotra, S. S., & Gill, K. D. (2013). Quercetin protects against aluminum induced oxidative stress and promotes mitochondrial biogenesis via activation of the PGC-1α signaling pathway. Neurotoxicology, 51, 116-137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuro.2015.10.002

Shehata, A. A., Schrödl, W., Aldin, A. A., Hafez, H. M., & Krüger, M. (2013). The effect of glyphosate on potential pathogens and beneficial members of poultry microbiota in vitro. Current Microbiology, 66(4), 350-358. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-012-0277-2

Tang, Q., Tang, J., Ren, X., & Li, C. (2020). Glyphosate exposure induces inflammatory responses in the small intestine and alters gut microbial composition in rats. Environmental Pollution, 261, 114129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114129

Tinkov, A. A., Skalnaya, M. G., & Skalny, A. V. (2021). Molecular mechanisms of aluminum neurotoxicity: Update on adverse effects and therapeutic strategies. In A. Santamaria & S. Aschner (Eds.), Advances in Neurotoxicology (Vol. 5, pp. 1-34). Academic Press.

U.S. Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service. (2012). Glyphosate-tolerant H7-1 sugar beet: Final environmental impact statement. USDA APHIS.

Van Soest, P. J. (1994). Nutritional ecology of the ruminant (2nd ed.). Cornell University Press.

Vincent Corporation. (2018, July 5). Sugar beet pulp. https://www.vincentcorp.com/content/sugar-beet-pulp/

Wroblewska, P., & Hikawczuk, T. (2021). Dried sugar beet pulp as a source of soluble dietary fiber in equine nutrition: A review. Journal of Equine Veterinary Science, 101, 103454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jevs.2021.103454